Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ImageTrend Inc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

ImageTrend Inc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All sources seem to be passing mentions, thereby failing WP:GNG. WP:NCORP doesn't seem to be met either. WP:BEFORE check didn't bring up anything of note. Kirbanzo (talk) 07:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:39, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:39, 4 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete only coverage is routine listings and the like; no indepth coverage Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:41, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:SPA article on a company. Appearance on fastest-growing lists is insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH and searches are not finding anything to indicate this as more than a company going about its business. AllyD (talk) 07:59, 4 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.