Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Images and Words: Live in Tokyo / 5 Years in a LIVEtime

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 04:33, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Images and Words: Live in Tokyo / 5 Years in a LIVEtime
Make a one line entry at both Live in Tokyo and 5 Years in a LIVEtime. There is nothing else notable or new about this. RickK 06:48, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Tempted to agree with RickK; an article whose title is two things does not need an entry separate from the 2 things as independent articles. Also "Live in Tokyo" should be a disambig, as its also the title of a PiL album. -R. fiend 07:06, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, fancruft. Megan1967 09:33, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Okay, I'll agree with this.  My only reasons for creating the article in the first place were 1. it IS listed as a separate entry on DT's official discography, and 2. someone had already included the link in the main Dream Theater article.  ;)  I have made the relevant entries on the individual pages, so there's no need for this article at all.  As far as disambiguation goes, I'm not sure how to do that, so someone else will have to handle that. --Durga2112 13:56, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 16:09, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, is all. Wyss 01:26, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. It can be expanded to a real article. The fact that it is stub is not a reason to delete the article. --Jannex 08:19, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Durga. Radiant! 10:30, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * merge and redirect all 3 articles into 1 single article, where there'd be enough content to prevent further deletion. Kim Bruning 23:30, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * I disagree with this. The LIT and 5YIALT articles are stubs at this point, but they both can easily be expanded upon, just like any album-related articles (well, they're not exactly albums, but close enough).  --Durga2112 14:06, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment It's a toughie, but the only difference between the VHS and DVD is the fact that the DVD has a commentary track, so I'm not sure what could be written in this article. I think the two main articles should remain seperate, but there is the possibility for this article to be expanded into something worthwhile. --plattopus (talk) 15:40, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.