Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Images of autofellatio

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 10:06, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Images of autofellatio
Dup of autofellatio. Vacuum c 16:33, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Please count my vote as neutral. I am merely converting it from an errant speedy to VfD. Vacuum c 23:07, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * delete, was broken off without discussion. --SPUI (talk) 17:17, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redundant page. Binadot 17:46, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't see a reason for a split. The whole controversy at autofellatio is about the images, but this won't solve it - it's not like the anti-image people won't be against images on this page, too. And otherwise, any content that could be written here should be in the main article. T IMBO  ( T A L K )  17:47, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I appreciate Ed's irony, but delete this fork. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 17:53, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete gcbirzantalk 20:48, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * abstain. This is part of an ongoing discussion between ed poor and others.  I don't want it to be deleted yet although I don't think it's necessarily going anywhere. I'd like to reserve the right to vfd, if necessary, after discussion has proceeded for a while--although I expect that Ed himself would be quite willing to list it if it came to that. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:36, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. For reasons discussed in detail on, mainly that the fork will not resolve the issue. Johntex 23:49, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant/duplicate fork. Megan1967 23:55, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Independent of the controversy, there is no good reason for a separate article consisting only of these images.  "Images of autofellatio" is not an encyclopedia topic.   If the consensus is not to have these images in Autofellatio, then there is no valid reason to have them in a separate article.  --BM 02:15, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As above Arno 04:35, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- this won't solve anything -- Longhair 10:00, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per ongoing discussion. – flamurai (t) 04:11, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)