Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Images of chronic wounds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 14:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Images of chronic wounds
No text, page made because some images were deemed too strong for main article. This is not a valid reason since Wikipedia is not censored. Also other ways around this are presently available, see autofellatio Joelito (talk) 04:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have readded the images to Chronic wound. After the silly Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons argument, I think it's safe to say that Wikipedia is not censored for the faint of heart. '  (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 05:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. AdamBiswanger1 05:18, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The pictures belong, but not here. And since this isn't an article, it should be deleted. Inter lingua  talk 05:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Move the pictures elsewhere, but get rid of the article. It seems purely created to promote the pictures.--Auger Martel 07:44, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per   (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)'s actions. Death Eater Dan'''  ( Muahaha ) 16:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, two images no not consitute an article. Paul Carpenter 16:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ouch! that looks painful. as per sticking the pictures back in Chronic wound W guice 16:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Wikipedia is not an image repository. - Tangot a ngo 17:07, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge images into Chronic wounds Perhaps as a gallery?--The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 22:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.