Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imaginary Lines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete both. Michig (talk) 17:53, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Imaginary Lines

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The article is not sourced and has a lack of established notability from WP:N (music)

I am also nominating the following related page because of said reasoning, plus that it is a two-sentence stub:

Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 08:01, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 September 16.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  08:15, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 10:16, 16 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete both. The project does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO, as I'm unable to find coverage in reliable sources.  Gongshow  Talk 02:58, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 14:40, 23 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources. If in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources is added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.