Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imagine (Video game series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Discussion of a possible merger can occur outside of AfD. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  03:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Imagine (Video game series)
Discussion to run until at least 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod contested on the grounds that it is a Nintendo DS game. To be sure, the article also claims that it was made by Ubisoft, a claim I will not question. But other than these two tidbits, the article asserts no notability for this game.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 03:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment it's a series article and they definitely exist, they're bombarding me with advertising.. *retch*. The first game on that list has its own article, Imagine: Animal Doctor, and a search of that title alone produces an IGN review and a press release detailing some of the games. So at least of them definitely exist, and if one gets an IGN review then collectively they should be notable. Not inclined to pick through each game to see what should go where though <.< Someoneanother 03:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I think any game by a major publisher for a major platform meets our notability standard. The stub certainly needs expansion, though. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 04:45, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and redirect As per brighter orange. Also redirect this page to Imagine (video game series)--SkyWalker (talk) 06:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - More info about some of the games can be found here. However, none of the individual articles link to reviews. SharkD (talk) 07:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge / Redirect - Merge into Ubisoft. There is little content, and most of the article is a WP:List, something to be avoided.  I don't think deletion is appropriate here though.  Can we change what little content there is on this page into prose and make it redirect to Ubisoft?  If the game later becomes more notable, then it can get its own page.  Also note for the discussion there are TWO separate (identical?) pages and only one has been marked for deletion, one with a capital V and one with a lowercase v.  Cazort (talk) 21:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think a merge would be a good idea since Ubisoft is responsible for publishing so many game series. SharkD (talk) 02:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I.e. the Ubisoft page should be strictly business-related. SharkD (talk) 07:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.