Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imagine Optic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:58, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Imagine Optic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Although there are a number of references in the article, only one that I was able to check mentioned the company that is the subject of the article, and that only in passing. A quick WP:BEFORE check brings up numerous passing mentions, usually mentioning the use of equipment manufactured by the company, but no significant coverage of the company itself. Created in exchange for undisclosed payments and promotional in tone, this article is not suitable for Wikipedia as it stands, and the topic itself does not appear to meet our criteria for inclusion. Yunshui 雲 水 12:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  15:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  15:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 03:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 05:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:46, 24 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; coverage is in passing, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Promotionalism only. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.