Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imankalyan lahiri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Imankalyan lahiri

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability. Autobiographical having been created by user with same name. Was created under a different name (albeit in a different format and information level) and speedy deleted. I'm not certain either way, so I present it to the community, but I'd personally lean to Delete. Ben W Bell  talk  13:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete under WP:COI. The re-creation of an autobiographical article that's already been speedied certainly is the triumph of hope over experience, I guess. And while I loath autobios with a passion, this guy seems to be borderline notability at best. He gets just a couple of academic hits as Lecturer in Political Science of Netaji Subhas Open University and . Without anybody stepping forward to independently verify his notability, this has to go, I think. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 14:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per Alasdair. Even if COI were not a factor, he's not notable anyway. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   -- Lquilter (talk) 23:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not under WP:COI - that isn't a deletion criterion - but for lack of notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.