Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imbalzano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   that there is a clear consensus to delete because the subject does not meet the notability guidelines for an article in the encyclopedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Imbalzano

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Author made a page about himself Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 00:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete - zero notability, nor any assertion thereof J L G 4 1 0 4  01:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment To avoid "conflict of interest" I have deleted all links! But this avoid also the completeness of INFORMATION! SEE: "OMISSIS to avoid 'conflict of interest' but you see also all external links in WIKIPEDIA!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imbalzanog (talk • contribs) 12:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's a mess and there's nothing establishing notability. Adam Zel (talk) 06:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, the biography is complex, but it reflect an entire life —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imbalzanog (talk • contribs) 15:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * See also EXTERNAL LINKS, that you admitted in other part of Wikipedia! Imbalzanog (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

I reviewed the article, and NOTABLE point are 1) the ANECDOTE 2) RICH productivity 3) remarkable COINCIDENCE of scientific discovery on FERMAT (Wiles/Imbalzano) 4) eccentricity..? Imbalzanog (talk) 07:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Attention, in the interest of all the users. 1) I stayed contacted from a certain < anime_addict_aa@yahoo.com>: he has recopied the page ""http:// en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/ Imbalzano" on "http]:// www.wikinfo.org/ index.php/ Imbalzano"; he believe to do me a favor, without any request from me. 2) Applications from isolated users exist for cancellation of the page on "wikipedia" in base to the conceitedness of a personal interest, to which I have already answered, without strong objections from administrative part. 3) I remember: other interventions (past and future) they have made said page of the all neutral! 4) Now, finished the 5 days of discussion, I would ask kindly, also in the interest of the democracy on Wikipedia, to conclude with the acceptance of the page "Imbalzano." 5) Certainly, the ownership of English language will be bettered. User and member: "imbalzanog" (= Imbalzano "Garant"), for don't confuse this with "Giovanni" Imbalzano. Imbalzanog (talk) 20:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC) '''For ROBsavoie. Please read, and with much attention: see you the ISSN and ISBN?! NOT DELETE''' Imbalzanog (talk) 21:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC) '''WP? Article is not political and not is commercial!''' Ah, ChrisTheDude is a scientist..? Imbalzanog (talk) 22:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm too stupid to be able to find even a small clue as to what the article is about. But its author is its subject, and that's a no-no, yes? Proxy User (talk) 18:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * NOT DELETE! Not at all! Documented exceptions exist: see Entire rules, please! William B. (ITALY)
 * Delete - even if the subject were not the author, the subject is non-notable, writings are self-published or conference papers. The almost unreadable translation doesn't help. Robsavoie (talk) 20:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - almost totally incomprehensible, but from what sense I can glean from it this does not seem to be a notable person. No equivalent article on it.WP, which is not a good sign..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * WP stands for Wikipedia... Oli OR Pyfan! 00:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I've tried the NOTABLE (sic) references. I can't say I agree with that definition. I'm not prepared to search through five or more sets of stuff on one of them, and couldn't find the subject's surname in another before it crashed Firefox. (Up to that point it consisted of a list of university people one or two of whom might have been notable. I didn't check them.) One that did mention the subject was from 1999 and appeared to be in connection with something for translating into Italian either used by or endorsed by the subject. I hope it's better than whatever was used here. On web search, I did find rather a lot of lulu.com. This is a self-publishing web-based outfit, which is fine if you are producing something of local interest and limited market. Being published this way indicates a lack of notability in the sense used at Wikipedia. On this search, I didn't find much (if anything at all) that I'd really consider reliable third party indicators of notability. Sorry. Peridon (talk) 22:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * ChrisTheDude was saying there is no article on this subject on the Italian language Wikipedia, and that this indicates non-notability as far as the Italian speaking Wikipedia community is concerned. It could be that one has not been posted yet - if so, why not? It could be that one has been deleted. A quick index check there indicates it hasn't been posted there. Peridon (talk) 22:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete If he isn't sufficiently notable for the Italian WP, I don't see that he's sufficiently notable here. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 22:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per ChrisTheDude and Dori. Oli OR Pyfan! 23:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.