Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imelda Trilogy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 01:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Imelda Trilogy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article about a short film series, not reliably sourced as having a solid claim to passing WP:NFILM. The notability claim being made here is that two of the films won short film awards at second-tier film festivals like Images en vue, FICFA and Cinémental (and by the way, don't be fooled by the ambiguous way its Cinémental award appears to be tied to its premiere at the much more significant Quebec City Film Festival, because it did not win an award at FCVQ, and Cinémental is an entirely different and much less notability-clinching festival) -- but these claims are not referenced to reliable source media coverage about the film, but to primary sources like the filmmaker's own self-published PR kit and its online rental page on Vimeo. The only footnote that actually comes from a real media outlet is a community weekly that isn't widely distributed enough to get a film over WP:GNG all by itself if it's the only real media source on offer. As always, every film award that exists is not an automatic free pass over NFILM -- NFILM concerns itself with major awards, such as Oscars, CSAs, BAFTAs or the top tier of internationally prominent film festivals (TIFF, Berlin, Cannes) that get broad media coverage, and not with just every single film festival that exists on Earth. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the films from having to have much, much better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 14:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The other language article is much more complete and has a lot more references and detail, but most is minor or promotional. I don't see anything there or in my searching that meets WP:GNG Jeepday (talk) 18:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.