Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immaculate Induction Hypothesis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Immaculate Induction Hypothesis
del Nonnotable albeit smart parody on intelligent design published in a private website boldly mamed "Science Creative Quarterly". Thus smacks original research heavily. `'mikka (t) 04:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete clever, but not nearly as notable as the Flying Spaghetti Monster that inspired it. Opabinia regalis 04:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  as WP:NN paradoy. Ghits are 14. SynergeticMaggot 05:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. 3 google hits for: "Immaculate Induction Hypothesis" -wikipedia
 * Speedy Delete senseless, a FSM replica and sourceless Arturo #7 18:19, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -Rikoshi 22:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article is properly referenced to an article in an academic journal, albeit an unconventional one. Additionally, the theory presented is an important contribution to the creation-evolution debate. John254 02:22, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to the main article on the FSM. It is sourced but is not notable enough for its own article. JoshuaZ 00:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.