Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immersion Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:04, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Immersion Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Many claims, but no actual notability. They have tried to introduce may things, none of them notable. Most of the references are mere notices, on suing and being sued for infringement, supplemented by a few promotional interviews.

This is part of a not very skilled promotional campaign for its sister company, Immersion Corporation, and their founder, for whom see Articles for deletion/Louis B. Rosenberg. (I am not nominating Immersion Corporation--I think I may have been able to fix it, but it anyone thinks it's still promotional and non-notable, please let me know when you place the AFD. )  DGG ( talk ) 01:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment As the person who originally raised the COI on Rosenberg, my impression is that even with COI Immersion Corp and Unanimous are notable. Whether their clear promotional nature warrants them for retributive deletion is another question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrigadierG (talk • contribs) 06:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - Not notable. I agree with DGG. Mommmyy (talk) 19:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite into normal past tense instead of historical present. Most of the promotion is gone, and the company has been around long enough and in the news a number of times to be notable to me at least. I also ran across the article Immersion v. Sony which is n linked from this one but hidden behind a pipe. Not sure if that was intentional. There was a bit of coverage of that case, and there are 20 years of SEC filings, including a recent take-over attempt not mentioned. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4280751-immersion-corporation-activist-shareholders-circling-company https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/immersion-elevates-legal-head-to-ceo-after-waging-patent-battles
 * As per the original comment, please clarify. It sounds like user DGG did indeed nominate this article to be deleted. The sister company might be Unanimous A.I., which has been around much less time and seems more dubious, claiming to be able to predict events that are in the past? W Nowicki (talk) 22:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC) Relisting comment: Bold third relist for further input. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.