Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immigration from Singapore to the United States


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As CaliforniaAliBaba  notes, there's nothing sourced to merge. Sandstein (talk) 08:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Immigration from Singapore to the United States

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Why does this need its own article, this type of immigration is really Non Notable. ~ S R  S ~ 01:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Asian Americans has been informed of this discussion. cab (talk) 02:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.   cab (talk) 02:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a sufficiently notable topic to justify its own article. KleenupKrew (talk) 10:16, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * merge relevent details to Immigration to the United States as probably not notable as a stand alone artile. Additionally, could someone tell me how to remove Immigration to Puerto Rico from the category "Category:Immigration_to_the_United_States". Thanks Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per Jasynnash2.--Berig (talk) 15:02, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see any content worth mergeing. An article on this topic could be created (though possibly titled better) and it could be extremely informative; but it would take a lot of hunting for obscure sources, and I see no evidence of the intention for such an effort here. -Verdatum (talk) 21:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per Verdatum; there's nothing sourced to merge, and quite possibly nothing sourceable. See the searches I performed in the hidden box below --- I've written articles about all sorts of obscure immigration patterns, and searches like those will show with results even for unlikely combinations of non-Anglophone countries, like Mongolians in South Korea or Iranians in Japan, but they give no reliable sources for Singaporeans in the United States. Apparently no one with any institutional credibility backing them up has found the topic worth looking into before, so therefore we can't write a Wikipedia article on it. cab (talk) 11:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.