Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imortal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. happy to inclubate or redirect on request Spartaz Humbug! 11:25, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Imortal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Upcoming TV series with minimal information available. I don't see this as notable yet and it's not proven that it will be notable after the series starts. Note: Due to edit warring and possible vandalism over an unsourced cast list, I've had to fully protect the article so, unfortunately, any improvements will have to wait until things have calmed down, but let's discuss notability rather than the quality of the article for the minute. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   02:23, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

I recommend this article to Strongly Keep. The Lead stars of Imortal, Angel Locsin and John Lloyd Cruz already revealed that since that they had already started to shot the series. Many reports that Imortal will be air in August, 2010. Redskater (talk) 03:00, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment if deleted, redirect to Immortal as an R from mispelling . 70.29.212.131 (talk) 03:45, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.-- Nilotpal  42  04:27, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per 70.29.212.131 Tb hotch Ta lk C.  23:03, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep In addition to the two URLs in the article, which appear to be RS to me, adding the network name to the Google News search yielded this, which appears to confirm that it's an upcoming show for which real promotion is being done, in which case it appears to meet both the GNG and WP:NME. Jclemens (talk) 06:30, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Incubate and improve for a few weeks and then return without prejudice. While User:Jclemens makes a valid point about it approaching WP:NME and WP:GNG, I feel that letting it bake over at WP:Incubation for a while will allow improvements to be made as more information is forthcoming. However, if it can be adequately expanded and sourced over the next couple days, I'll glady switch from Incubate to Keep.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.