Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impact Press (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 14:05, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Impact Press
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Last AfD resulted in no consensus. Does not seem to meet WP:NOTABILITY criteria. Boleyn (talk) 17:56, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge/Delete Could find no references and no information to fill in the article. I added it to List_of_political_magazines in the "no longer published" section with a link to the Web site. If this article is kept, then the magazine name should also link to this article. LaMona (talk) 19:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 28 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. There are sources for this, including      . There are also a number of citations. It is difficult to find them because "impact press" can refer to other things including a notable publisher and a search for it produces a lot of results related to impact, press, and upset steel forgings. A search for "impactpress com" (its URL) produces mostly relevant results (including 42 citations in GScholar) as does this search suggested at the last AfD. IMPACT Press (magazine) would be an unambiguous title. James500 (talk) 20:50, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 21:21, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (confess)  @ 10:21, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.