Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impact Pro Wrestling (Australia)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 10:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Impact Pro Wrestling (Australia)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced and not notable. Community television deal does not prove notability and article contains much information that is not cited and appears to be advertising. Was prodded but prod removed without appropriate improvement ' !! Just a Punk !! ' 23:22, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   --  Bduke    (Discussion)  00:33, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

— 121.208.248.52 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WWGB (talk) 03:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - It is a work in progress and a ligitimate Federation whith more history than any other wrestling Federation in Australia with International Fame and Shows. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.208.248.52 (talk) 01:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - It Is True, I train for this wrestling federation, all information correct and up to date. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.208.178.134 (talk) 01:23, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - No sources to verify above comments, and comment above violates WP:OR and WP:COI. Where is the mainstream third party coverage? Agre with nom - this is advertising with bits added.  Get  Dumb   01:41, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:N. Needs mainstream sources. Query compliance with WP:CORP. And are comments by anons allowed? I agree with GetDumb about WP:COI per the second anon. TaintedZebra (talk) 01:50, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete can't find any 3rd party reliable sources to show notability. I'd also question the existance of Impact Pro Wrestling (New Zealand). Basement12 (T.C) 02:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Hard to find any references to verify its notability. The only scant references in this part of the world pertain to the New Zealand version.  Murtoa (talk) 03:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. Referenced only to a primary source (ie, self-referenced) means only one thing - it has no notability.-- Lester  04:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.