Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the performing arts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator turns out to be a blocked sock. MelanieN (talk) 20:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the performing arts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not relevant, too many micropages about Coronavirus Kilographography (talk) 19:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 20:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The page was created after a discussion with User:Wittylama on Talk:Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the arts and cultural heritage as the page Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the arts and cultural heritage cannot list all impacts towards performing arts and/or a reasonably comprehensive list of streaming performing arts production. The performing arts page is modelled after both the arts and culture page and Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the music industry. Corachow (talk) 20:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of COVID-19-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I believe this should be speedy closed as a bad faith nomination. The nominator is a brand new, first-day user with fewer than 20 edits, at least one of which was to falsely tag a new article as a hoax. Others were to place fraudulent accusations on Jimbo's talk page. I doubt if that user will be with us for very long, but in any case this is an invalid AfD nomination. -- MelanieN (talk) 20:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * and....blocked as a sock. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as no valid rationale given. We don't care whether you think there are "too many articles" on any given topic; either something meets our notability criteria or it doesn't. &#8209; Iridescent 20:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is more than a "micropage" and is a narrow-in-scope, valid, and sourced topic. --MuZemike 20:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.