Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial British Conservative Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. The nomination has been withdrawn per the message from the nominator (User:JDDJS) at Articles for deletion/Deadly Serious Party, which states “I am taking a break. Any page that I nominated for deletion recently that does not have any delete votes and at least one keep vote can be closed as nomination withdrawn”. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 06:48, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Imperial British Conservative Party

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable joke party. JDDJS (talk) 00:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Frickeg (talk) 01:54, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is an absurd nomination. This was a registered party in two separate countries (Australia and New Zealand), contested multiple elections, and has plenty of coverage (and that's just from Google, not even considering the coverage not available to us online as most of the party's activities took place in the 1980s). Frickeg (talk) 01:54, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. As Frickeg wrote, this is an absurd nomination.  I can't speak about NZ, but in Australia during the late '70s and throughout the '80s, every time there was an election one could count on Murgatroyd getting some coverage for the IBCP.   -- 64.131.244.143 (talk) 03:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. S.G.(GH) ping! 08:23, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Abundant coverage in reliable sources in multiple countries. An obvious keep. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 04:09, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.