Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial Republic of America

Imperial Republic of America was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete. Cool Hand Luke  23:34, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Advertising for some micronation allegedly founded last week. 62.214.28.39 13:46, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, totally non-notable. Gazpacho 14:54, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, on the grounds that it is clearly lying. Average Earthman 17:21, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax - --Cyprus2k1 17:29, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, as said nation does not exist. The laws of the US provide no means for groups to secede from the country. The same should be noted for all futher micronations originating from within US borders. --Huge colin 18:10, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * User does not have significant contributions outside of VfD. --Improv 18:23, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense. --Improv 18:22, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not big, not clever. Seems like a speedy to me. Terrapin 19:26, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete. No more plausible than Cascadia.
 * DELETE. Web fiction. Gazillions of degrees of magnitude less plausible than Cascadia.--Gene_poole 21:50, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete. Cascadia is no more plausible than the IRA in the effect that no means exists within American law to create a nation within the borders of the United States.--Antman 22:06, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Nonsense. Delete.  RickK 22:17, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete Yet another silly micronation. Samboy 23:06, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity, not notable. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 23:21, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Also delete American Imperial Party if this is deleted.  [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 00:16, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)
 * I see no reason to delete American Imperial Party, since it is only indirectly related. This just points to Poccil's ignorance on the subject. |MikeK
 * Delete. Secessionist fantasy. Talks about their hypothetical future state as if it exists.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 04:19, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. Fire Star 05:36, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * redirect to Bad_jokes_and_other_deleted_nonsense, funny stuff.--[[User:Plato|Comrade Nick @  )---^-- ]] 10:21, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. NeoJustin 02:56, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete for being Secessionist drivel. And their coat-of-arms has been ripped off of Empire of Attica from NationStates. No imagination here. Do we have a page for the Republic of Texas secessionist group? No? Then this one is out, too. Inky 02:58, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Not surprising they're the same coat of arms, since Antman is the creator of both articles. RickK 23:00, Oct 30, 2004 (UTC)
 * NationStates has a lot to answer for. Delete - David Gerard 12:27, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.