Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial Theatres


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A quick and gentle suggestion to, post the consensus comments; perhaps they should give a quick read to our WP:deletion policy and AFDOUTCOMES before nominating other articles. (non-admin closure)  Lourdes  03:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Imperial Theatres

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has been created a long time ago without having any references.  Diako  « Talk » 15:42, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:44, 1 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Well the redirect was created long ago and the article today.  It needs references but ....PRehse (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:16, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:16, 1 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - You found something in Category:1732 establishments and you decided today that it is not notable? Seriously? Go and find sources: -- Petri Krohn (talk) 22:11, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * This is not my duty to find sources for other articles. The creator of an article must provide sources for it.  Diako  « Talk » 07:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep -- sufficient mentions in Google books to indicate notability of this topic. The subject has a well developed ru.wiki article as well: link. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't say it is not notable. I nominated it for deletion, because it does not have any sources and the creator of the article has not even made an effort to mention sources for it since 2009.  Diako  « Talk » 07:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep Then this is a waste of time. WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. The nominator isn't even claiming it's non-notable. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:39, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.