Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial phase


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No support for deletion (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 19:07, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Imperial phase

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NEOLOGISM – Although there are many sources that use the term, only two discuss the concept itself. Ilovetopaint (talk) 07:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 February 14.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 08:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  08:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  08:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added some more sources, and several of them discuss and expand upon the concept of the imperial phase. They seem to constitute significant coverage. Gilded Snail (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Numerous examples of its usage as described in the article e.g. Billboard on Taylor Swift, TMRW magazine on Katy Perry, NME on Muse, Bob Stanley on Fleetwood Mac, Guardian on Lady Gaga,Financial Times on Ariana Grande, Entertainment Weekly on Madonna etc.

I created the article as I believe the range and frequency of its usage justifies its encyclopedic interest. I also believe the article provides sufficient context to demonstrate the relevance and context of the term.

The Simon Reynolds reference as published in his book Shock and Awe discusses the concept, but it keeps being removed by the nominator even though it is referenced and can be found on Google Books. There's no requirement for an online reference to be given, and the published book is more than sufficient.yorkshiresky (talk) 19:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - As per 's argument. Also I think it needs to be understood the user who wants this page to be deleted continues to remove a whole lot of information from the page. (2001:8003:4F0B:4500:DDBA:DF6E:BF0F:B510 (talk) 07:22, 16 February 2019 (UTC))


 * Keep - Clearly there's countless examples of the term being used, as other users have noticed. This is a term I've seen a heck of a lot, and Ewing has used it frequently elsewhere such as on Freaky Trigger. A site specific Google search through the Guardian alone for the term reveals pages full of "imperial phase" being used, with a Take the Crown review also outlying how Tennant says an imperial phase ends. Doing the same site specific Google search with other websites like Pitchfork reveals lots of other uses, while this has a bit more detail on the phase of he who coined the term, for instance. Certainly a widely-used shorthand.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 02:43, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * IF kept, article should be moved to Imperial phase (arts) to distinguish this from use of this phrase in sentences like: " the aggressive Imperial phase of Athenian foreign policy," " the aggressive Imperial phase of Athenian foreign policy," "1532, the imperial phase of the Ibero-African frontier began," "neither Britain nor France is completely out of its post-imperial phase," and so forth.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:52, 21 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.