Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial stormtrooper spies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Imperial stormtrooper spies
nonsense, fictional tales. Not encyclopedic, or notable --Ragib 01:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: as nominated. --Ragib 01:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: A related article from the same author is also under afd at Articles for deletion/Imperial specialists. --Ragib 05:02, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Deletion as patent nonsense Lakhim 01:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete for all the above Jadriaen 01:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC).
 * Delete - and the defense written into the article just makes it worse. That defense should have been written here. - Richardcavell 01:37, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete All of the above. 69.145.36.133 01:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete -- getcrunk   juice  contribs 01:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as utter nonsense, indeed nonsense of such a high degree that if there was a WikiNonsensense I'd urge a prompt transkiki. --BrownHairedGirl 01:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Utter nonsense speedy please--64.12.116.8 01:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Hold on a minute The nonsense at the top of the article was not from the author. Somebody had created a template called   with all the nonsense about GGFan. Author of this article got confused in trying to put the    tag here. I have fixed the misspelled template to refer to the real one. Please review the article again. It's now bad fancruft instead of absolute garbage. Here's the bad version of the template . - Fan1967 01:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, that changes everything. Delete as bad fancruft. - Richardcavell 01:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Exactly, or maybe fanficcruft. Fan1967 02:02, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete It's still patent nonsense. The bad template wasn't the problem, even if it was irrelevant and misplaced. Not only is it WP:CRUFT, it's badly written and unsourced. Morgan Wick 02:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonsense and likely fan fiction. BryanG 02:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Starwarscruft, fan fiction. Better on the author's own webpage, as this is unencyclopædic in all respects.   (aeropagitica)    (talk)   04:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Starwarsfanficcruft. J I P  | Talk 08:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Some sort of nonsense. DarthVad e r 13:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete precisely as per Richardcavell: bad fancruft. It has a trivia section!  I got news for the author - the whole article fails to rise to the level of trivial. Just zis Guy you know? 15:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with 501st Legion (Star Wars). There is Star Wars stuff here for the entire Expanded Universe.  Even though the article is badly written, I think the author was trying to write about something that exists in the Star Wars universe.  Aguerriero  ( ţ ) ( ć ) ( ë ) 19:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:NOR Aeon 21:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete randomcrapcruft with poor punctuation M1ss1ontomars2k4 22:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I love this new "randomcrapcruft" you're sticking everywhere. My new favorite term. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 01:25, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverified, unsourced nonsense. I haven't finished Battlefront 2, but I've never heard of any significant trooper espionage units after the Clone Wars. -LtNOWIS 16:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.