Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imphal Free Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &#x222F; WBG converse 07:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Imphal Free Press

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP, only source is official website. Waggie (talk) 03:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:09, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:10, 27 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep The newspaper seems to get reasonable coverage. It seems quite respectable -  see the citations in the Encyclopaedia Of Manipur, for example.  The worst case would be merger into a list such as list of newspapers in India, per WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE. Andrew D. (talk) 22:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The publisher is a vanity-press and neither does the author seem to possess any minimal credentials.So, we can't care any less about what he writes and what he chooses to source his writings to.
 * You can use other sources that cite it, though. &#x222F; WBG converse 13:42, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * No need to merge. The publication is clearly notable and very important! The sources say so explicitly. gidonb (talk) 02:48, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMEDIA, WP:GNG, and WP:NEXIST per ample sources in Google books and elsewhere. In the article now six such sources. All WP:RS sources are relevant per WP:NEXIST. WP:NCORP is of indirect relevance at best so I did not check. Please nominate wisely! gidonb (talk) 16:06, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMEDIA, WP:GNG, and WP:NEXIST per ample sources in Google books and elsewhere. In the article now six such sources. All WP:RS sources are relevant per WP:NEXIST. WP:NCORP is of indirect relevance at best so I did not check. Please nominate wisely! gidonb (talk) 16:06, 30 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of newspapers in India.A trivial discussion over here.Merely being cited to, by a few sources, doesn't contribute any notability. &#x222F; WBG converse 13:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry but AfDs operate by the relevant sources not by the irrelevant ones. gidonb (talk) 02:20, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * "Apologies for getting it wrong.Strange stuff.And, that was superb work. &#x222F; WBG converse 07:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. The citations in the opening graf, if accurate, confer Notability on this newspaper. I am surprised that we don't have more third-party sources, but I am not sure if any journalism trade publications exist in India. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * BeenAroundAWhile, extremely precise quotes and I just added a third source that nails it even more. This is such an unfortunate nomination. gidonb (talk) 00:07, 17 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Strong keep-Per Gidonb's work. &#x222F; WBG converse 07:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.