Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impolex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 20:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Impolex

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable film. Lacking GNEWS and GHits of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM ttonyb1  (talk) 22:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:00, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are no independent, reliable sources that discuss the film in depth in the article and I can't find any via google.  There's a fairly robust web presence but all the substantial coverage I saw was in unreliable sources and all the reliable sources were minor mentions.  Eluchil404 (talk) 07:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per Eluchil404's research and reasoning. Drawn Some (talk) 16:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Eusebeus (talk) 15:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.