Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Import classic 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Import classic
This was deleted back in December 2005, and little seems to have changed. Neologism, I couldn't find a single relevant google hit, despite the article's claim that the internet is spreading its popularity. &mdash;Xezbeth 10:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and previous AFD. Dar-Ape 17:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Article has changed some from previous article, but still seems entirely non-notable. The phrase is an obvious neologism, as a google search turns up that few, if any, references use this phrase in the context described in the article.  It has NO reputable sources, and the FIRST hit is the Wikipedia Article itself.  That is ALWAYS a red flag.  Original Research is not allowed, and so it must go --Jayron32 20:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.