Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impotence pimp

Impotence pimp was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

The term "Impotence pimp" turns up no results on google. CheekyMonkey 08:56, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * A completely worthless rant. Speedy deletion material. Tannin 09:03, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * I think this is not speedy material, but it's clearly BS. Delete. Cool Hand Luke  09:35, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Why wasn't Poverty pimp ever deleted?
 * For the record... I just asked the acting sysop, User:SimonP, and he added an explanation to Votes for deletion/Poverty pimp. His judgement on that article was was "4 keep votes + 1'hesitant to delete' vs. 7 clear delete votes and 1 delete vote by an anon. No consensus in favour of deletion." Also... unpleasant as it is... "poverty pimp" is in real use, at least to a degree to which "impotence pimp" is not. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 21:23, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * The idea that non-profit organizations could be called Poverty pimps is about the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Why not call encyclopedias ignorance pimps? This term isn't just obscure and POV, it's too stupid an idea to be dignified by an encyclopedia entry. I also think the article for Dr. Strangelove should go deeper into the character's impotence. -- Chaz
 * Delete -
 * Hey there Cyprus, you accidentally stuck your signature in the section header. I removed it. Could you re-sign your vote please? --Improv 15:33, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsinnlich. --Improv 15:33, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV rant. jni 17:23, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism, original research, cannot be made NPOV. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 19:54, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Why not "microphallus pimp?" ;-) "Impotence" in a broader sense may be almost an accurate observation, but, of course, this is a rant and "original research," to be nice about it.  Geogre 20:43, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism with no currency - SimonP 02:33, Nov 7, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Antandrus 02:42, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is no way to justify deleting this and keeping something as idiotic as Poverty pimp. -- Chaz
 * Results 1 - 100 of about 821 for "Poverty pimp". (0.26 seconds) Your search - "Impotence pimp" - did not match any documents seems like a reason. We're not judging the idiocy of the terms or the nobility of their users, we're judging whether they're real terms in actual use. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 03:28, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism with no apparent use outside Wikipedia. &#8212;No-One Jones (m) 03:32, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, exterminate. POV neologism. Chaz is wrong too. JFW | T@lk  03:43, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism, POV rant. I wish poverty pimp had bitten the dust too, but them's the breaks.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 04:22, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Oddly, I thought this would be an article about Bob Dole... - Nunh-huh 04:29, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Give me a break.  [[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 09:22, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.