Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impressive Title


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 08:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Impressive Title

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Procedural nomination, article was PRODded by, but the article was already deleted once via PROD in 2010.

The1337gamer's concern was: "Fails WP:GNG. Lacks significant coverage from reliable sources." &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 08:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  The1337gamer (talk) 09:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree that it fails the WP:GNG. It seems like nothing more than a fan's documentation of non-notable minutiae about the game's history. Non-notable fangame. If someone finds sources, like the ones documented at WP:VG/S, I'd be willing to reconsider though - there could be some hidden out there behind all the false-positives that would come up with searching for such a generic name. Sergecross73   msg me  19:23, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:Notability (video games) -- Anar  chyte   00:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , just pointing to a policy without an explanation of reasoning is a deletion argument to avoid. – czar   15:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unfortunately all my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found no good third-party coverage. SwisterTwister   talk  20:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) There are no worthwhile redirect targets as the dev is not well known. Please ping me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. – czar   15:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.