Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imprisoned by fossil fuels


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  23:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Imprisoned by fossil fuels

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article reads like a book report and not an encyclopedic entry. It is a sincere effort, but I think it runs into WP:OR issues. Pastor Theo (talk) 03:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. B+ for effort, but it reads like a school essay and not an encyclopedia article. —C.Fred (talk) 03:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - completely unencyclopedic in its current state. The title indicates a strong bias and the article focuses on the US.  DRosenbach  ( Talk 03:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not original research, but it reads like it. Delete. Esteffect (talk) 03:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep flag it up - npov, synth parts, etc - but genuine info, sourced...why delete?  Chzz  ►  16:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * List of energy topics, starting with Energy (society) has plenty of links to fairly encyclopedic articles on the subject. What's the poing of diluting them with a partisan essay? There's nothing special to justify Imrisonment instead of improving, say, Energy crisis? Delete. NVO (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a collection of high-school essays. -Atmoz (talk) 20:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Reads like essay. If there is anything worth to keep (which I doubt), merge these parts into the Energy policy of the United States. Beagel (talk) 07:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.