Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impropriety (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Impropriety (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looks to be a local performance group. Most of the sources do not seem to be RS, or are connected with the subject. The fact they keep going out of business does not inspire confidence in their notability. Legacypac (talk) 23:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:51, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:51, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:51, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 10:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, lacks general notability and reliable references. Ireneshih (talk) 06:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for now at best as none of this suggests a better applicably notable article. SwisterTwister   talk  06:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.