Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Improvements to Wikipedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was userfy. -- RHaworth 18:32, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Improvements to Wikipedia
This does not belong as an encyclopedia article, because it's a personal essay; although it could be a user page... --Mysidia (talk) 09:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * this probably needs to be a user page not a article Yuckfoo 10:05, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Billbrock 10:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to user space, otherwise delete as per WP:NOT a soapbox. Lukas 10:55, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I acknowledge this is an opinion and not a fact. However, I do not know where I could locate it so that it would be available to all in Wikipedia. I would have wrote in some forum discussing the subject but I had no knowledge of such a forum nor had I any way to find it, Wikipedia being what it is, respectfully. You may suggest something. How can I make it a user page? By copying it onto my personal page? Teemu Ruskeepää 13:05, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to user space. Teemu, you can move the content to a subpage User:Teemu Ruskeepää/Improvements to Wikipedia or the like, or just to your main user page as you wish. - Randwicked Alex B 13:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy or delete, this doesn't belong in article namespace. If Teemu moves the article to his userspace then I could close this AfD and delete the resulting redirect. J I P  | Talk 15:29, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy it. --kingboyk 16:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. Wikipedia should accomodate this kind of discussion in public. Also it should be stated publicly that who decides about clearing the deletion discussion notice from this article now that it's where it's supposed to be.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.