Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impulcity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. consensus is clear after relisting  DGG ( talk ) 08:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Impulcity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Coverage is mainly routine and/or local notices of early investment and product announcement--do not help with CORPDEPTH--and a three-sentence mention on the Today show. Logical Cowboy (talk) 11:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The article do not fails WP:CORPDEPTH, before proposing an article for deletion, you should really make some researches. May I add, , , , and . Those are not investment and product announcement, those are real news website about the App and corporation. May I add that the app is based in Cincinnati, that's why all the news are about that. The article clearly pass WP:CORPDEPTH. --Karlhard (talk) 12:42, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Reply Karlhard, don't you think you should declare your COI? The extent of your promotional editing is truly massive.  Here are some of the warnings you deleted from your talk page.         .  Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Logical Cowbow, please let me learn how to edit articles, PLEASE. I did not get paid ANYWHERE for those articles, I deleted the messages from my talk page because I don't know who are them and I was afraid that my reputation could get down, I know that the history of deletion keep registered. but I declare I DID NOT GET PAID FOR THOSE ARTICLES. Now, the discussion is for Bikini Luxe, an article I researched and created, everyone who creates an article SHOULD declare COI? However, you may know that I do not need money (and for editing Wikipedia Articles), should I laugh? I deleted the proposed deletion because they are pointless to me. Thanks for giving me such a hard time learning on Wikipedia, you can delete all articles if you want, also delete my talk page and why not the user? Good evening. --Karlhard (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 05:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mostly local coverage. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * You are stating that local coverage does not make it local? WP:BRANCH please, make some research. Karlhard (talk) 18:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete; today show bit is the only claim of significance and that's only a passing mention. Definitely falls short of CORPDEPTH.  Nik the  stunned  16:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.