Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impulse Black


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  05:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Impulse Black

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Just a few local interest puff pieces. Prod removed by "an Executive of Oceanus Pictures" who owns one of producer/writer/star Jordon Hodges' pictures and who has stated that using Wikipedia "is part of a marketing game plan." duffbeerforme (talk) 11:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per the general notability guidelines. I cannot find coverage in reliable sources about this topic. I see from Duffbeerforme's link that the involved executive hopes to screen this at a film festival. That is fine, and if that happens and coverage results, we can revisit having an article. Regardless, any future article needs to follow WP:NPOV. It is generally not a good idea for those involved with the film to work on the related article, most especially not the reception section. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 15:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. If Hodges's article survives AfD it can redirect there, but considering that his coverage has been almost entirely and solely local, I'm not really holding out a lot of hope for that. There just hasn't been a depth of coverage for this film enough to warrant an article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   15:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  17:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of notability, The cited sources are just local coverage of a "Gosh! someone from round here is in a film: people round here will be interested" nature. (NOTE: The article was created by a single purpose account, very nearly all of whose edits are about one actor and his films, and some or all of the other edits concern other actors who have worked for the same film company.) JamesBWatson (talk) 16:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage beyond some local papers. -- Whpq (talk) 17:23, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete It's obvious the movie is a real movie and many people have seen it (just based on the amount of message boards of people talking about it). But it seems they released the film more of a guerrilla style instead of having more notable sources talk about the film.  -- Vorspire (talk) 15:52, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * what? You do realize you created this article... correct?  Are you saying that you created this entire article, with lovely infobox, and you are now realizing it was entirely fluff?  Was it handed to you in an email entitled, "Please post this on Wikipedia for us"?   PeterWesco (talk) 03:53, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems like User:Vorspire has been blocked. Regarding the AFD does not meet WP:NFILM. This certainly is an odd AFD. Mkdw talk 08:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.