Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imraan Khan (cricketer, born January 1984)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The SandDoctor Talk 20:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Imraan Khan (cricketer, born January 1984)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. Nothing in my searches. Störm  (talk)  20:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: I strongly believe it should be deleted because reliable sources are week and this article written just for advertisement purpose.TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC) [There are reliable sources available via ESPN CricInfo; it's just they haven't been cited. It would be relatively straightforward to simply delete all the Cricket Archive references and replace them with CricInfo. DevaCat1 (talk) 16:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)]
 * Strong keep: he has played 4 first class matches and 3 list A matches, in games where scorecards are definitely available and match reports are likely to be available with sufficient perusal of the South African press. I don't understand how there can be nothing in searches when there are multiple pages on a major website (CricInfo) referring to him. DevaCat1 (talk) 16:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Has played 4 FC and 3 List-A matches, passing him for WP:NCRIC. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:46, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rugbyfan.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 13:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the sourcing is not enough to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.