Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imran Noshad Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is the sourcing doesn't add up to more than BLP1E, and notability concerns ab out the event remain. Star  Mississippi  03:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Imran Noshad Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BLP1E. All coverage looks to be related to pepsi qr code incident. Slywriter (talk) 02:50, 15 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:28, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and my PROD rationale; textbook case of WP:BLP1E. Ovinus (talk) 02:55, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 08:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, this person might meet WP:GNG, but that is only a presumption of notability, not a guarantee. As mentioned above, WP:BLP1E applies here and makes clear they are not notable. —Ganesha811 (talk) 03:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Although the sources in article are mainly about single event but they all do mention of the other details of personal separately like him being activist and podcaster hailing from Karachi. I stubbified the article before moving it from draftspace and the rest of few details in it are not unsourced. So I think we shouldn't do haste in its deletion, let it be there for sometime to add more sources and improve it further. USaamo (t@lk) 10:55, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Subject notability is debatable though but the event coverage in article is merely two sentences in the end. Other details in the article are though sourced but from same sources about that event. Muneebll (talk) 07:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, despite the fact that the one event this individual received coverage for caused biographical details to be known, this is standard for most individuals involved in BLP1E scenarios. Given that, I believe the coverage fails to establish notability. Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:47, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I looked at the citations. They all seem third party and also published by third parties, so notability is there. Even if it might be initially a stub for now.--Sylvester Millner (talk) 21:17, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * This argument does not address the WP:BLP1E argument. It's worth noting that all the sources were published within a few days of each other. Ovinus (talk) 21:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - per BLP1E. Textbook example: only coverage is related to event; he is otherwise a 'low-profile' individual; and the event itself is not notable or significant. ‡ El cid, el campeador  talk  13:33, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete 100% agree that this is a textbook case of WP:BLP1E. KSAWikipedian (talk) 18:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * and if this is a case of WP:BLP1E, then would you suggest moving this article to that event? VR talk 05:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
 * That's the thing—the event is probably not notable either. Quoting the article, "he saved a 7 Up beverage truck driver from a mob for blasphemy allegations over a QR code". This is an important component of the three conditions for BLP1E (If the event is not significant). Ovinus (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree with Ovinus, I don't think that the event meets notability either. KSAWikipedian (talk) 06:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.