Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InBios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

InBios

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

InBios Does not meet WP:CORP. It's been flagged for not meeting WP:GNG since 2014. I looked on google scholar here and could find a few independent reliable sources discussing accuracy of some of their produced tests, but nothing about the organisation itself.

Darcyisverycute (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Medicine. Darcyisverycute (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom: little to no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Current references are press releases written by the company, and a DOD and an FDA mention that essentially note the company's existence. There's one other report here which at least has the virtue of being independent of the InBios PR department, but does not cover the company so much as the CEO's views on pandemic management. Too little there to meet GNG. -- Euryalus (talk) 23:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not meeting notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 06:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.