Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InCa3D


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. no real consens on whether it passes WP:GNG/WP:N JForget  14:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

InCa3D

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. Software with no indication of notability. Delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 19:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 03:49, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per the nom, No indication of notability, fails WP:GNG. Codf1977 (talk) 20:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Software IS notable and widely use in by electromagnetic technicians and engineers, references are good too Terveetkadet (talk) 15:11, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with Terveetkadet. The fact that the software is used in preparing so many scholarly articles demonstrates its notability. Unless Blanchardb is an expert in the subject field, I suggest deferring to the opinion of the researchers using the software. &mdash; HowardBGolden (talk) 06:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Strong Keep Interesting simulation tool in the same vein as OrCAD. The software is well and well known, and is clearly notable. scope_creep (talk) 20:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.