Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InMotion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. L Faraone  03:28, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

InMotion

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Student racing team lacks coverage in independent source to meet WP:NORG (Cursor is a publication from the student's university). MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:44, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:NORG as well as the lack of secondary sources to be found. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:23, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - A quick search on Google News showed many independent sources that were English based. As they are based in the Netherlands, there might be other language articles that would have more resources to pull from. Additionally as an academic led student group, there are most likely other resources in JSTOR or academic presses. There was a promotional tag that someone placed and the student group does appear to be looking for corporate sponsors and there is the possibility that is somewhat reflected in how the article might have been originally written. I made a couple changes to the article to try and improve. Most of the citations would need to be completed with author, article titles, etc. I am interested in trying to work on this article and I will add it to my Watchlist after this post. Adam MLIS (talk) 02:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per reasons provided by Adam MLIS Jack4576 (talk) 06:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Keep The subject of the article covers a wide range of important and relevant topics. In particular, the names of scientists, racing drivers and companies that support this team. Perhaps some points like the vision are questionable, but for now I'm rooting for the article to remain --Loewstisch (talk) 16:18, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.