Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InSegment.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

InSegment.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No real evidence for notability -- just placement on lists. The references are the usual mentions and PR, almost all in unreliable sources  DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:43, 27 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article supported by passing mentions, listings, primary and local coverage. The awards listed do not indicate more than a company going about its business. No evidence provided or found to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG notability. AllyD (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete -- fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH & significant, independent RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.