Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InVANET


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge. —Random832 15:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

InVANET

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

A duplicate article exists - Intelligent Vehicular AdHoc Network E_dog95'   Hi ' 07:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge - clear case. Both articles were started by the same user within a minute, but not as duplicates. Lars T. 01:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment - Yes. The articles share the same author. It's clear to me these articles are related; they use the same terms. It could be said that they're saying the same type of things which, as it turns out, is not much. Both pages have a lack of notability. So ...these get merged. Then what do we have? An article that still doesn't qualify as encyclopedia material with no notability or references.
 * Look it up -  E_dog95'   Hi ' 05:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Kurykh  05:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Eliz  81 (C)  10:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete or merge if it has anything not already in the other article. Collectonian (talk) 16:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge and delete. Add any useful information or sources to Intelligent Vehicular AdHoc Network --S.dedalus 00:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.