Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InZania


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete, as the article did not make any credible claims to significance for the company. If anyone wants to use the content to try and build a better article from, please feel free to ask at my talkpage or at WP:REFUND. Skomorokh, barbarian   03:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

InZania

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

continued feedback? changes made, no idea how to find revenue & profits of a privately owned company —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paska12 (talk • contribs) 00:58, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

No reliable sources (the page on Mixx.com which was added after a request for references does not appear to fulfill the requirements of WP:RS), unencyclopedic advertising-like text ("has sought to bring innovation, quality and customer satisfaction to the mobile space by creating applications that marry the computing power of a desktop with the convenience of a mobile device"), no evidence for encyclopedic notability, several fundamental "hard facts" about the company are missing (number of employees, revenue & profits, ownership). HaeB (talk) 00:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

The article was created about a company that I liked based on information provided from their website. I am a first time Wikipedia user but I tried to follow the wikipedia guidelines and alter the article based on comments from the Wikipedia group as they were listed on the article. I would love more feedback so I can learn to be a better wikipedia user but I feel that I have met the guidelines for this article and enjoyed trying to create my first article (and learned a lot!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paska12 (talk • contribs)
 * Hi Paska12, would you mind answering the question on your talk page?
 * You are welcome to improve the article in the coming days, but in its present state it does not satisfy several important Wikipedia policies.
 * Regards, HaeB (talk) 00:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete References consist only of links to this company's own website, and the company's products on the iTunes website; not even close to meeting WP:GNG. As the article was originally written in the format of an advertisement, it's unreasonable to expect Wikipedia editors to try to find sources and clean up the mess. No thanks. Andrea105 (talk) 01:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- - 2/0 (cont.) 03:31, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 22 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete a7 Miami33139 (talk) 01:17, 22 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.