Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In And Out Of Focus Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete because it was already deleted by as G11/A7. (NAC) –Ammarpad (talk) 10:15, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

In And Out Of Focus Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The PROD tag was removed without explanation; the removal of two unreliable sources doesn't magically clear up issues. My PROD rationale still applies here: total lack of secondary sources and no indication of independent notability. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as A7 / G11; a promotional directory listing on an in-house label. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:51, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.