Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Jin Moon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Any redirect is a matter of editorial consensus.  Sandstein  17:04, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

In Jin Moon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Sourced almost entirely to related (and generally WP:SELFPUB) Unification Church sources. Sole exception is NNDB, which WP:RSN has found to be unreliable. In any case none of these sources contain more than bare mentions (let alone "significant coverage"). find reveals nothing more than a handful of bare mentions. Recent opinion is that presidency of the Unification Church of the United States does not bestow any substantial notability (see Articles for deletion/Tyler Hendricks (2nd nomination) & Michael Jenkins (religious leader)). HrafnTalkStalk(P) 02:47, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. It sounds like this article about Ms. Moon may be attempting to ride on the coattails of Rev. Moon, but unfortunately, notability is not inherited. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - her main claim to notability appears to be her leadership of two organisations which themselves have dubious notability. The sources are poor.  I can't conclude from what's in the article that she is herself a notable person, but I'd yield to someone with more knowledge of the subject matter. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NOTE. Yet another instance where seems not to be cognizant of WP:BLP, and has created an article on a living person sourced only to primary sources and unacceptable sources that fail WP:RS (NNDB, etc.). Cirt (talk) 16:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and merge. COI note: I am a member of In Jin Moon's church. Is it possible to keep a REDIRECT from In Jin Moon to True Children or True Family? I was unable to find the proper secondary sources yet. And is there really a hurry about this? --Uncle Ed (talk) 16:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: it was a redirect until you decided to recreate the article without secondary sources. It is your 'hurried' & ill-thought-out recreation that necessitated this AfD. It was pointed out to you three years ago that such actions are "unacceptable", if you didn't "pay any attention" to that, or any of the repeated advice since, then you can hardly be surprised when it results in another AfD. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 18:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.