Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In One Ear (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn - hasty decision to start deletion debate and per reasoning of TenPoundHammer. Non admin closure -- Mo ainm ~Talk  21:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

In One Ear (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Per WP:NSONGS not enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; article is unlikely ever to grow beyond stub. Mo ainm ~Talk  15:21, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose Keep Woah, woah, woah. Slow down! I just created the article about fifteen minutes ago! I've been working on adding the Chart Performance, Music Video, and Release and reception sections to the article! The song just reached number one on the Billboard Alternative Songs chart, and I was going to expand the article as I received more information... I have been using the "Back Against the Wall" article as a template for this one. At least give the article a chance. WereWolf (talk) 15:25, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You have completed the article as you say, and it has 9 sentences hardly a detailed article. Mo ainm  ~Talk  16:52, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll add more if necessary. I was planning on expanding the music video section anyway.. Jeez... WereWolf (talk) 17:59, 29 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — Mo ainm  ~Talk  17:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Short but contains sufficient information for a standalone article; newly created and easily expandable. I think the nominator seriously jumped the gun by nominating an article fifteen minutes after its creation, which is why I'm calling for a speedy keep. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.