Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Search Of (film) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

In Search Of (film)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable film. There are sources, but sources do not mention film. Dead sources possibly support that this was screened at a festival, but that does not establish notability and there is no in-depth discussion or coverage. I am AGF but I am having a hard time understanding why many of these sources were used as they do not appear to involve film at all. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk  20:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America.  ‡ El cid, el campeador  talk  20:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: You might want to to search typing "InSearchOf" and/or maybe add Rady's name, otherwise (and even then) searching this film is quite difficult. This review exists. And the Quebec film directory lists the film's title as having been translated .... In Search of Sex. Note: yes, screenings at festival may establish notability but I couldn't check the claim. Final note: I have issues understanding this sentence in the article: "In Search Of was the first film to play in another reality when it screened in Second Life in 2008."- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  00:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The source linked is not a full review but "synopsis provided by CinemaSource" per the small text after the first pargraph. CinemaSource is of dubious reliability and the coverage at just one paragraph IMO is at best marginal SIGCOV. I was unable to find further sourcing on IMDb, RT, Google, or Google Books using various different names as the film title is highly common. This also fails to meet any additional NFILM criteria. So, with IMO one source questionably counting to GNG I am at a delete.  VickKiang  (talk)  11:26, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. I can't find any WP:SIGCOV to add at all. Fails WP:GNG. Jacona (talk) 20:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. The sources listed in the article might come close to notability but they are currently dead links.  Was kept previously in the hope that better sources would be forthcoming but instead what little there was has disappeared.  Should be deleted until and unless better sources such as reviews can be found.  Eluchil404 (talk) 00:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.