Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In a Sense


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. --Luigi30 (Ta&lambda;k) 14:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

In a Sense

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article was previously deleted 9 days ago, under A7 (failing notability). Recreated with the same content, its prod was removed without comment. Reason for the prod was again failing music notability. The only notability claims the article does are releasing albums under an indie label ("Symphonic Illusion Records", I cannot find much about this label through Google), and that it has had some of their songs remixed by other bands. ReyBrujo 05:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. One album, and the only Google hits for "Symphonic Illusion Records" refers to this record, so it may be just their name for a self-release. No entry on allmusic.com (the string takes one to "Inasense", an different entity). If "has a strong following" is true, it doesn't show on their web site, which lists no upcoming shows, and a grand total of two previous shows, in suburban spaces - in February and March of 2006. Granted, they may just not update their web site, but what else are we supposed to go on? In the "News" section of their website, what do we have but "IN-A-SENSE on Wikipedia" as their big news, which doesn't put me in an especially good mood toward this whole endeavor. To the bit bucket with them! Herostratus 06:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete (which will make reposting nuke-on-sight as db-repost). Not notable, even its flimsy claims of notability are not cited; also most of it is somewhat hopeless spam/promotional material. DMacks 06:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per discussion and nomination. Seems to be a promotional entry - ain't what we're here for. --Dennisthe2 06:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Recreator did not follow WP:UNDEL which states that the article should be requested for undeletion, not just recreated. → &ensp; J A R E D &ensp;(t)&ensp; 20:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:BAND. Feels a bit spam-like too. WJBscribe 23:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BAND. ShadowHalo 08:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.