Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In for the job


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already speedily deleted by Bwilkins. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

In for the job

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unnotable movie. No CSD applies to movies. I don't see how this is relevant, based on this simple search. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 13:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of the existence of this film. Possible hoax. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy - G3 applies. Fæ (talk) 13:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Tagged as G3. It's hard, though, to prove something doesn't exist. We'll see how it goes. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 14:00, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This is an alleged movie; according to the article this is a plot synopsis: there where two brothers stranded in the desert with no food or water and where digging for water when they stumbled upon a pipe they climbed inside and found a camel lolwtfbbq hi callum.  Looks like an obvious hoax, as well as patent nonsense, to me. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - obvious G3 material that needs to go POOF! - Pmedema (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.