Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In ovo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn because I somehow didn't notice it was still in progress. Sorry, folks! (non-admin closure) Ansh666 17:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

In ovo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not convinced this can pass beyond a WP:DICDEF, though seems to be WP:Notable enough. Not opposed to transwiki-ing to In ovo. Ansh666 05:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Keep. The article was just created at 0358 24 September 2013. Ansh666 put a deletion tag on it at 0520. All stubs are essentially definitions until they get developed. See Viral pathogenesis. In Ovo is notable in the medical field. The article is well-sourced and is undergoing expansion. Malke 2010 (talk) 06:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Keep. Agree with Malke. It is wiki policy to allow development time and I'm sure Malke and others can expand this. Pumpkin Sky  talk  10:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Keep  This is wp:snow. The article is not even a day old and already has suitable types and depth of sourcing to establish wp:notability multiple times over, and is already a well written encyclopedic article on an encyclopedic topic. North8000 (talk) 12:02, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.