Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In te


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mr.Z-man 01:21, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

In te

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nek's second album In te seems to have not receive any coverage in reliable, secondary sources, other then his primary bio that is cited in the article as of this time. Even if this album did chart, the lack of significant coverage would prevent this from being a notable-enough topic for a Wikipedia article. The article fails the guideline of WP:NALBUMS in my opinion, but lets hope to god we can change that consensus from delete. Even the notability of the singer, while having some other albums that have done commercially, has also appeared to have been questioned. 和DITOR E tails 23:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:39, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:15, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.