Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In the Dark (Camila Cabello song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Camila (album). (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉  (HAPPY 2022) 15:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

In the Dark (Camila Cabello song)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NSONGS - all the sources are from it's parent album and therefore should be redirected there. LOVI 33  15:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Low charting on small, national charts and sales figures not unexpected in Brazil based on the sales of the album it was pulled from. None of this notability has led to any content that could be written about the song itself. The details that are present could be easily addressed in a discography, album or bio article without causing any bloat to those articles. if that is the case, redirect to the article that makes sense. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I have updated with some additional sources. Most of what I found are mentions or review of the track within an album review, but there is lot's of that, which I haven't added. Chelokabob (talk) 22:47, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I encourage you to read over WP:NSONGS which mentions that song articles should have reliable sources that don't come from album reviews or album interviews in order to be considered notable. Right now there is only one source that satisfies that, the Tigerbeat one. But that is not exactly the most reliable source. To me, Tigerbeat seems like a gossip rather than a news site. LOVI  33  18:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Camila (album). There does not appear to be evidence of significant coverage of this song in third-party, reliable sources (i.e. outside of primary sources and album reviews). However, there appears to be limited coverage and this is a viable search term so rather than delete this article, I think it would be more beneficial to redirect to the album article. Aoba47 (talk) 03:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Camila (album). Fails WP:NSONG per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 01:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.