Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In the Gray of the Morning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gene Cotton. Noting that there is sourced content that can be merged. czar 01:28, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

In the Gray of the Morning

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject fails WP:NALBUM. RSN says that AllMusic is only reliable for their written reviews; their catalog doesn't connote notability. I'm not sure that the newspaper articles, which are good sources, cover this album in enough depth for WP:GNG. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 17:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 27 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:27, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: One more relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 00:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I find no reviews of the album, given the age of the thing/before the internet, not surprising. Plenty of hits in 19th century newspapers for the phrase... I don't feel qualified to vote either way at this point; if others can find sources, I'll revisit. Oaktree b (talk) 23:18, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gene Cotton. Fails WP:NALBUM per nom. A WP:BEFORE shows nothing beyond AllMusic and a segment in a Billboard magazine. SBKSPP (talk) 03:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to Gene Cotton. The BLP could better use these sources, such as they are. The Billboard "segment" linked by User:SBKSPP seems a bare mention. BusterD (talk) 10:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * A redirect will do. SBKSPP (talk) 00:17, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect per BusterD or Merge. -- Otr500 (talk) 12:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.